The
soap operas begin…(sorry, no pictures this time)
A
while ago I wrote about Population Media Center (PMC) and their work using soap
operas to change behavior. This past
week I had the privilege of observing their training session for the people who
will write the scripts for the two radio soap operas to be broadcast here in
Burkina Faso. The 24 participants are
people who have applied for the position of script writer. Based on their
experience and credentials, they were chosen as the finalists and this week is
their training in the Sabido methodology that PMC uses to produce these serial
dramas to change behavior. After four and
a half days learning about the Sabido method they each created a 5 minute radio
script. This was the basis of the final decision about who the writers will be.
The
workshop was facilitated by Kriss Barker and a number of people who worked on
PMC soap operas in other African countries including Mali, Rwanda, and Senegal.
Based on how well the writers have
understood the method, and how creative they are, PMC will select the four best
writers who know Djula and the four best writers who know Moore, creating two
teams who will write the two different soap operas. As I have mentioned before, Burkina Faso has
many different ethnic groups and each group has its own language. People want to preserve their ethnic identity
so they speak that language at home and teach it to their children, leaving it
to the schools to teach the kids French. Also, people who did not go to school
or who did not succeed in school often only understand their local language. The
target audience for the soap operas is mostly the rural population, who do not
have access to TV and who may not have learned French in school.
The
first day introduced the general idea of soap operas to change behavior, but
the biggest part of the day was devoted to a report of the formative research
that was conducted. The researchers used
several methods to get information.
Probably the most important was the use of focus groups to find out what
people believe about certain issues. In selecting the participants they tried
to get representatives of all sectors of society. What the people in the groups
said was recorded and transcribed so the script writers will be able to look
over what people said and adopt the words and phrases real people used when
talking about the issues. This is
important because it makes the characters more real and like the folks next
door.
The
opinions expressed by the participants in the focus groups were analyzed and
basic attitudes expressed were summarized to give a general picture of how
people of various ages and both sexes feel about the various topics. One
question was, “what is the family?” People said that there is the linear
family, those related to you by blood, but there is also the extended family
that includes relatives by marriage and distant cousins. Even close friends and
neighbors may be considered to be brothers and sisters here and are thus part
of the family in this sense. I have noticed this here, where someone will
introduce a good friend as his brother or sister. I sometimes ask later whether that was a
“real” brother or sister and often find out it was a close friend, who is like
a brother or sister to the person.
In
spite of modernization, traditional views of the roles of men and women
remain. People say that men are the
“chief” or head of the family and make all the important decisions for the
family. The role of women is to obey
their husbands, have children, and take care of the household. They are always
expected to be submissive. Because of their vulnerability, they need to be
protected by the man. The role of the children is to help with tasks and to
obey their parents. Children are considered to be the wealth of the family. These
attitudes were expressed by both men and women.
The
researchers also did an analysis of the existing research on some of the major
issues and my favorite finding was the average number of children Burkina Faso
women have, depending on their education.
Women who have no schooling have an average of 6.5 children, women
completing primary school have an average of 4.9 children, women who finish
secondary school have an average of 3.4 children and women who complete college
have an average of 2.4 children. Educating women is one of the best ways of
slowing population growth.
The
Sabido method uses melodrama as the basic theatrical form. In a melodrama there is a clearly bad person,
and a clearly good person. The Sabido
method adds a transitional character, one who struggles to make a change of
behavior throughout the series. This person is influenced by the bad person to
behave in a bad way and by the good person to behave in a good way. This is the critical character, the one with
whom you want the listeners to identify and the person whose behavior you want
them to adopt.
The
Sabido method actually creates long running serial dramas rather than soap
operas. While soap operas can run for 20
years, the serial dramas have a long but limited run, usually a year and a half
to two years. It has to last long enough
to let listeners see the change in the behavior of the transitional character
over time, and to see that character facing some of the difficulties in making
a change in behavior and how those problems can be overcome. That helps show people how to deal with
problems they are likely to experience if they also try to make a change in
their behavior.
In
the Sabido method, you start with the theme, or problem you wish to
address. This leads you to an idea about
the behavior you want to change, but you need to do the formative research to
confirm or change your focus. For
example, a campaign aimed at married women to help them avoid AIDS will do
little good if they are contracting it from husbands who become infected while
working in the city or another country.
The behavior you have to change is really that of the husbands and not
the wives, so your transitional character has to be a man and the program has
men as the target audience.
After
you are sure of the behavior you want to change, you make a “values” grid,
listing the values that would be held by the negative character and the values
that would be held by the positive character. Only after you have the values
clearly in mind do you identify who the three important characters will be and
begin to make a plot line. This is completely backwards from the way most
script writers approach writing. They
usually start with a story idea and develop characters after they have the
basic plot. That is the reason for the week long training in this method.
In
reality, each serial drama has three or four different themes that move along
in parallel throughout the series. Sometimes they intersect, but most of the
time each plot line is separate. Each group of characters has to be introduced
and the audience has to be hooked on the story before you get to the place in
the story where the behavior of the transitional character starts to change.
The audience must recognize the good character as good, the bad character as
bad, and find the transitional character to be likeable and realistic. The bad
character must be really bad, but not despicable. That is, the bad character has to clearly
believe that his or her behavior is not bad, but completely justified.
Once
the plan for the show is made and the first few episodes are written, they are
tested with audiences to see if people are reacting to the characters in the
expected way. Kriss told about a time
when the writers had a negative character who was a man who beat his wife and
spent a lot of money drinking. The
script writers thought they had developed a character was clearly bad, but the
test audience thought his behavior was normal. This kind of testing to see that
the program is working as it should is carried on throughout its production and
the characters and plot may need to be adjusted. That is why these writers will be hired for
two years, although they might be able to produce scripts for the number of
episodes needed in less time. They need
to make adjustments as the show is broadcast, to be sure it has the greatest
effect possible.
Because
the writers selected for these jobs will have employment for two years, I am
sure the competition will be keen. I was
wondering if this competition among the potential writers would result in
hostility between them, but as far as I can see folks get along well. I don’t
know who I would hope to get the jobs. I
like them all. It has been a real
pleasure to meet so many bright and talented people all in the same place! This
is, of course, just a summary of the highlights of the training, but I found it
fascinating and was grateful for the chance to see the training done.
No comments:
Post a Comment